Longevity myths

Quality:

Longevity myths - myths related to longevity. Article “Longevity myths” in English Wikipedia has 83.3 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 185 references and 35 sections. The article also contains templates indicating quality issues, therefore its score was reduced by 4.38 points.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

Since the creation of article “Longevity myths”, its content was written by 712 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 785 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 198 times in English Wikipedia and cited 354 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (English): #266 in May 2017
• Global: #2548 in May 2017

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (English): #2012 in January 2022
• Global: #5600 in January 2022

There are 8 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	English (en) Longevity myths		83.2545
2	French (fr) Mythe de longévité		73.2816
3	Spanish (es) Mito de longevidad		65.8288
4	Russian (ru) Мифы о долголетии		65.5569
5	Chinese (zh) 長壽神話		45.1623
6	Catalan (ca) El Mite de la longevitat		22.4265
7	Indonesian (id) Mitos panjang umur		21.6256
8	Greek (el) Μύθοι μακροζωίας		17.5777

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Longevity myths		3 948 729
2	Russian (ru) Мифы о долголетии		122 470
3	French (fr) Mythe de longévité		65 734
4	Chinese (zh) 長壽神話		8 360
5	Catalan (ca) El Mite de la longevitat		5 434
6	Spanish (es) Mito de longevidad		4 873
7	Indonesian (id) Mitos panjang umur		3 429
8	Greek (el) Μύθοι μακροζωίας		751

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Longevity myths		10 229
2	Russian (ru) Мифы о долголетии		890
3	French (fr) Mythe de longévité		595
4	Chinese (zh) 長壽神話		323
5	Spanish (es) Mito de longevidad		131
6	Indonesian (id) Mitos panjang umur		15
7	Greek (el) Μύθοι μακροζωίας		13
8	Catalan (ca) El Mite de la longevitat		9

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Longevity myths		712
2	Russian (ru) Мифы о долголетии		22
3	French (fr) Mythe de longévité		17
4	Chinese (zh) 長壽神話		11
5	Spanish (es) Mito de longevidad		10
6	Catalan (ca) El Mite de la longevitat		7
7	Greek (el) Μύθοι μακροζωίας		3
8	Indonesian (id) Mitos panjang umur		3

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	Catalan (ca) El Mite de la longevitat		0
2	Greek (el) Μύθοι μακροζωίας		0
3	English (en) Longevity myths		0
4	Spanish (es) Mito de longevidad		0
5	French (fr) Mythe de longévité		0
6	Indonesian (id) Mitos panjang umur		0
7	Russian (ru) Мифы о долголетии		0
8	Chinese (zh) 長壽神話		0

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

On 10 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Ilia Malinin, Bad Bunny, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Jutta Leerdam, Jake Paul, Puerto Rico, Little Saint James.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Bad Bunny, Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Savannah Guthrie, Ghislaine Maxwell, 2026 Winter Olympics, List of Super Bowl halftime shows, Eileen Gu, Jutta Leerdam.

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information